Jump to content
Tactically Inept

Army Tower Defense


kuhla

Recommended Posts

source - http://www.engadget.com/2015/10/01/army-gun-turrets/

source - http://www.army.mil/article/156189/Remote_controlled_weapons_augment_Soldiers_on_perimeter_at_NIE_16_1/

 

 

....

But with a new prototype perimeter protection system currently being tested at Fort Bliss, Texas, a single soldier sitting safely within the command bunker -- instead being of up on the wire -- can potentially do the work of 10.

The system, dubbed Tower Hawk, utilizes extendable towers packed into TEU shipping containers, known as "containerized weapons systems". Each station can be assembled in less than an hour by six soldiers. At the top of each tower sits a Browning M-2 50-caliber machine gun and a .338 Lapua sniper rifle (what, no lasers?). These weapons stations are wired together using the standard Joint All Hazard Command Control System and controlled remotely by a single operator. The Army unveiled the new system as part of the Network Integration Evaluation (NIE) 16.1, a NATO-organized event that aims to share new technologies among the coalition's members.

 

NmVtOF9.jpg

 

C6WMhXt.jpg

 

size0.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a cool system, and these type of technology based force multipliers are going to become commonplace in all modern militaries.

 

I love how for quite some time the military was against the idea of videogames and the bad habits that videogame players have when they join. And yet every new piece of tech seems to use an xbox controller and I bet a person familiar with videogames would be more adept at using and navigating these systems. Hell, I know that drone pilot programs target gamers as well. I just think it's a funny shift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet every new piece of tech seems to use an xbox controller and I bet a person familiar with videogames would be more adept at using and navigating these systems. Hell, I know that drone pilot programs target gamers as well. I just think it's a funny shift.

 

I think I've brought this up before but I actually chalk it up to ergonomics. Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo put a lot of thought, money and research time into ergonomics for their handheld controllers. Zero reason to reinvent the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ergonomics aside, the use of those controllers is only reinforcing that a certain level of experience in using a controller and coordination that would be present in games would be a benefit and not a detriment.

I'm not talking about their choice to use an xbox controller, I'm talking about the fact that playing the latest call of duty would give you a solid advantage in skills when using their platform.

 

There's a reason why the FAA allows pilots to use microsoft flight simulator as a substitute for some cockpit time. While I wouldn't go so far to suggest that any game is a substitute for military experience, I would be willing to put down money that a gamer would be a better operator of this system than someone who does not play games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...